<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-11-01</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:48:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dolphin</title>
		<link>http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>dolphin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>Yeah Jim, I know, I know.  It&#039;s been crazy.

And I&#039;m totally leaving the above spam comment (though I&#039;ll remove the spammer&#039;s link) because I think it&#039;s awesome that I can a spammer trying to make their comment look legit by cloning another comment on the same post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Jim, I know, I know.  It&#8217;s been crazy.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m totally leaving the above spam comment (though I&#8217;ll remove the spammer&#8217;s link) because I think it&#8217;s awesome that I can a spammer trying to make their comment look legit by cloning another comment on the same post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>Posting nothing but weekly twitter updates is barely considered posting at all, but double-posting &#039;em? Dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posting nothing but weekly twitter updates is barely considered posting at all, but double-posting &#8216;em? Dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim voorhies</title>
		<link>http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>jim voorhies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2009/11/01/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-11-01-2/#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>Posting nothing but weekly twitter updates is barely considered posting at all, but double-posting &#039;em? Dude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posting nothing but weekly twitter updates is barely considered posting at all, but double-posting &#8216;em? Dude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
