Comments on: War on Warren http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2008/12/18/war-on-warren/ Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:48:20 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: dolphin http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2008/12/18/war-on-warren/#comment-1466 dolphin Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:41:02 +0000 http://www.dolphinsdock.com/?p=598#comment-1466 I don't disagree with anything you're saying, the whole thing is just, to me anyways, not worthy of the outrage it's generating. Oh, and it may have been Feinstein and Pelosi's choice, but I do suspect that if Obama had been dead-set against it, it would not have moved forward. I don’t disagree with anything you’re saying, the whole thing is just, to me anyways, not worthy of the outrage it’s generating.

Oh, and it may have been Feinstein and Pelosi’s choice, but I do suspect that if Obama had been dead-set against it, it would not have moved forward.

]]> By: KipEsquire http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2008/12/18/war-on-warren/#comment-1462 KipEsquire Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:53:39 +0000 http://www.dolphinsdock.com/?p=598#comment-1462 P.S. I'm still not convinced that the blame doesn't belong more to Feinstein and Pelosi than to Obama. We just don't know how the choice was actually made. P.S. I’m still not convinced that the blame doesn’t belong more to Feinstein and Pelosi than to Obama. We just don’t know how the choice was actually made.

]]> By: KipEsquire http://www.dolphinsdock.com/2008/12/18/war-on-warren/#comment-1461 KipEsquire Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:51:02 +0000 http://www.dolphinsdock.com/?p=598#comment-1461 Well, besides the fact that Warren is who he is and says what he says, there is the feeling that Obama tried to game his own inauguration by trying to pick up some theocrat brownie points via the pick (at the expense of gays), rather than to strive to find the least offensive preacher possible for what is supposed to be an historic and unifying national event. Compare: Billy Graham may have been no champion of gay marriage, but he reached the heights he reached precisely because of his non-divisive, milquetoast approach to faith in the public square. Warren is about as far from that as is Louis Farakhan. Well, besides the fact that Warren is who he is and says what he says, there is the feeling that Obama tried to game his own inauguration by trying to pick up some theocrat brownie points via the pick (at the expense of gays), rather than to strive to find the least offensive preacher possible for what is supposed to be an historic and unifying national event.

Compare: Billy Graham may have been no champion of gay marriage, but he reached the heights he reached precisely because of his non-divisive, milquetoast approach to faith in the public square.

Warren is about as far from that as is Louis Farakhan.

]]>