Follow me on Twitter Entries RSS

Dolphin’s Dock

Why Palin’s Inexperience Matters

August 29, 2008

Filed under Politics

After months of defending Obama against charges of inexperience, Obama camp citations of Palin’s experience (which is even less than that of Obama) are being met by gleeful cries of “hypocrite” by Republicans. Those kinds of claims are missing the point entirely and might not be the road they want to go down. If it’s a hypocrite they’re wanting to see, a mirror might be a better place to check first.

The McCain campaign has more or less most all it’s eggs in one basket: Obama is too inexperienced to be the president. That’s been the dominant message of the whole campaign. But there is no stronger endorsement for the presidency that a presidential candidate can give than to select someone as their VP. By selecting her as his VP, McCain is saying, “If I can’t be President you are the person, out of the entire nation, I think would do the best job as President.” That’s a much stronger endorsement than any voter (who must select from available choices) can give a given candidate. Either McCain is knowingly not putting the best interest of country first, or he is giving an unsurpassed vote of confidence to Palin’s ability to be President (and not just to be a president, but to be the best president possible other than himself).

That means that, in McCain’s view, experience is not a necessary qualification for the presidency. Yet that’s the polar opposite of the assertion he’s based his entire campaign on up to this point. When he’s reiterated over and over that experience is an integral qualification for the presidency, then suggests that the best candidate for the job (other than himself) is a politician who has none, who is really being the hypocrite?

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

McCain’s VP

August 29, 2008

Filed under Politics

I’ve said in the past that if McCain has any sense at all, he’d pick a woman as his running mate (a black woman would have an even better political choice). I didn’t think he’d actually be able to bring himself to do it, but he has. Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is his VP choice.

I don’t really know much about the Alaskan governor, but from a demographic standpoint, I think she stands to help McCain out a bit. The biggest plus for McCain is that she’s a female. There’s still alot of Hillary supporters (though a minority of them) who have made it clear that they have no problem abandoning their liberal principles and ideals if going conservative would put a woman in the White House. Even the blind can see that these votes are the primary reason McCain made this selection, and the impact of it will not be small, as I have little doubt a good number will not object to McCain using them that way. The fact that Palin is young enough to be McCain’s daughter (in fact she is years younger than McCain’s oldest child), could be a double-edged sword for him. On one hand, bringing on somebody even younger than Obama onto the ticket could help reduce the criticism that McCain is too old to understand what’s going on in the modern world. On the other hand, when your VP pick cold be your daughter (and isn’t to far of from a granddaughter’s age), it certainly doesn’t make McCain himself look any younger.

As far as the issues go, I don’t know, and haven’t been able to find too much on her. She’s strongly pro-life which will help McCain with the social conservatives he’s had trouble with. On the other hand, while she opposes gay marriage and supported the state’s constitutional amendment to ban it, she also used her very first veto to block a law that would have taken away benefits from the partners of the state’s gay and lesbian employees, and she *gasp* admits to having gay and lesbian friends. That’s gonna take a huge chunk out of her social conservative street cred, while (with the exception of the self-hating Log Cabin crowd) not buy her any votes from gays and lesbians. In my opinion, one of the biggest issues of this election is the energy crisis. Palin seems to toe the GOP party line on energy with her “let’s drill everywhere” viewpoint. That shouldn’t be a surprise though when you find out that her husband is an oil exec with BP. The solution to the oil problem is not “more oil.” Bringing on such an obvious connection to “Big Oil” could potentially hurt.

7 Responses to “McCain’s VP”

  1. There’s still alot of Hillary supporters (though a minority of them) who have made it clear that they have no problem abandoning their liberal principles and ideals if going conservative would put a woman in the White House.

    I disagree. The only thing progressivist women hate more than pro-life men is pro-life women. They are the feminist equivalent of Uncle Toms.

  2. Well Kip, I hope you’re right, but I swear I was shocked at the irrationality coming from some Clinton supporters after Obama first became the presumptive nominee. I actually saw one salivating over the idea that young female Obama voters would die in back-ally abortions after McCain won and banned abortion!!

    On the other hand, you gotta love this quote:

    McCain wants to pull in Hillary voters, so he thinks he’ll accomplish this by picking a younger, prettier, but immensely less-qualified woman than Clinton to get the promotion she didn’t? Becuase, you know, middle-age women LOVE that story?

  3. Wow. That was beneath you. I’ve long respected and appreciated your analysis of issues (even if I didn’t agree with you) your writing ability and the genuineness of your posts. I was greatly touched by the post addressed to your mother as you eloquently spoke for so many gay men and women who have come out to their families. I have cheered for you and the BF as you got a new house and a new car.

    Today, I was taken by surprise. Your use of the phrase “self-hating Log Cabin crowd” was vacuous. I am completely out as a gay man. For the last few years, I have been a member of the Log Cabin Republicans. I attended the LCR convention a couple of years ago in D.C. and was part of a group that went to Sen. Frist’s office to lobby on several issues important to gay people. I was president of Nashville Pride and chair or co-chair the Nashville Pride festival for 3 years. I wrote a column entitled “Conservative Tendencies” for one of the local gay papers. I have supported numerous gay causes. My credentials as an out, gay man who is involved in the community are well established. But, most importantly, I do not hate myself nor have I met any other gay Republicans who hate themselves. We can disagree on issues and disagree on the relative importance of issues without stooping to smears.

    Do you really think LCR folks are “self-hating?” Was that just a glib throw-away line? Am I overreacting?

  4. I just don’t understand the logic of the LCRs. If LCRs said “I don’t agree with so-and-so’s position on gay rights but I think their position on X, Y, and Z is so important that I’m willing to vote for them in spite of their gay rights position” I might be able to understand it (granted, I wouldn’t agree because, with rare exception, I figure I won’t get to enjoy the benefits of X, Y, and Z if I’m not being treated as a full citizen of the country anyhow). But that’s not what I hear from LCR. What I instead hear is “This Republican hasn’t actually quite killed any gay people in cold-blood (that we know of), so clearly all gay people would be crazy not to vote for them. Meanwhile, this Democrat supports every single gay rights issue except for gay marriage, so clearly they hate gay people and any gay person who votes for them is a moron.”

    That’s not logic that I can even begin to understand.

  5. Or you could listen more closely and hear what LCR is actually saying. “We don’t agree with every Republican’s position on gay rights but we think their positions on X, Y, and Z are important as are the principles behind those positions. We are willing to support leaders who take positions that are good for the country as a whole while working to move the party in the right direction on issues important to gay people. We are happy to see progress in the Republican party as even Pres. Bush has publically supported civil unions.” Surprise, but the world isn’t just about Me! Me! Me! On gay issues, the Republicans aren’t as bad as the pathetic caricature that the high priests of gay orthodoxy try to portray. As far as the Democrats “support[ing] every single gay rights issue except gay marriage”, it might be best to recognize that even among gay people there is a wide variety of opinion on those issues. I, for one, do not need or want gay affirmative action in the form of ENDA or hate crimes legislation. “Supporting gay rights” has more than one meaning. (LCR is to the left of me on some of those issues.)

    Taking the position that, if you’re gay, you either hate Republicans or hate yourself, is simplistic and not very insightful.

    I would hope that gay people would consider all of the issues and vote for the candidate that most closely match their ideology. That makes for an informed electorate casting considered votes. The only morons are those that allow themselves to be used and taken for granted by their party.

  6. The thing is I have listened, and that ISN’T what they’re saying. If that’s the message you think is being put out, you guys need to hire a better PR guy. All I see from LCR is Democrats being slammed for any gay rights issue they don’t support and Republicans being promoted and celebrated if they are wiling to simply not publicly bash gays. [Edited to add: See what I mean? When the Log Cabin Republicans and the Family Research Council are both applauding the gay rights record of a VP pick, it says that one of them is way off base. Guess which one?] And for the record, President Bush does NOT support civil unions. He once said that while he doesn’t agree with them, he thought they should be left to the states. Then Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage and he decided that if the states weren’t going to do what he wanted them to, then we needed to amend the Constitution to force them to.

    And I’m sorry, but I continue to think that any person who doesn’t believe that they deserve equal protection under the law either hates themselves or the Constitution. If you disagree with non-discrimination, then fight to get rid of non-discrimination, but that’s not what the GOP is doing. They are fighting to keep non-discrimination laws for the groups they are a part of, but only to prevent gay people from gaining the same protection under the law that they themselves enjoy. You’re fooling yourself if you think fighting ENDA is anything other than fighting gay people.

    Lastly, I think that most people, gay or straight, consider all of the issues and vote for either the candidate that most closely matches their ideology or at least the closest match that actually has a chance at winning. But for many gay people, a primary issue is whether the government views them as legit citizens. If gay people aren’t viewed as legitimate citizens in the first place, than you can live in whatever world would be a utopia for you and not benefit one ounce because none of it would apply to you.

  7. I think Dolphin is right on. LCR would be fine if they admitted up-front that they view the (now non-existent) fiscal conservative view of the Republicans as more important than the (ever prevalent) anti-gay sentiments that the Republican base adores.

    What happened, and often happens, is that the LCR tries to see pro-gay acts in Republicans when there are none. Palin is a fine example – there is no evidence she is anything but anti-gay rights. Not just against gay marriage, but against benefits for DPs. Yet, the LRC claims she is inclusive – based on what?

    Same with McCain. He may be good for ‘core’ republican vlaues, but not for gay rights. So, support him if you want, but don’t try to spin him as good for gays.

    He’s not.

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

It’s Not A Temple

August 28, 2008

Filed under Politics, Splashes

If I hear one more conservative stating that Obama plans to speak from a makeshift “Temple of Obama” at the Democratic Convention, I’m going to scream. Classical architecture has long been associated with government. What was the symbol for your college’s Student Government? I’d bet it had a column in it. What do the White House, Supreme Court, and Capital Building (among other historic government buildings) have in common? Columns. Maybe, just maybe it’d make sense for a politician running for a major role in government to use symbols of government in his campaign. Nope, couldn’t be that simple, it apparently means Obama thinks he’s a god.

One Response to “It’s Not A Temple”

  1. Damn “Ionic versus Doric” partisanship!

    Still, isn’t there just a little bit of irony in a progressive party and candidate using classical backdrops? /teasing

    Just please, no tanks with somersaulting dolphins, right? ;-)

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

M-M-M-M-My Corolla

August 27, 2008

Filed under General

Seem like it’s been forever that I ordered my new Corolla. I have a tendency to not always be the most patient person in the world and when I’m dropping $19K on a product it makes it even harder to wait. I was, of course, well aware of why it was good for me to wait instead of buying a car off the lot. By ordering and waiting, I got EXACTLY the car I wanted. No compromising on color, features, model, etc. I also got a car that had not been test driven by other would-be buyers. Still it took a month for my placed order to come in, and that’s a long time to wait, ESPECIALLY when I didn’t know for sure how much time the engine in my current car had left in it.

My Brand New CarThen last night, on my way to jiu-jitsu, I noticed a big truck full of Toyotas heading in the direction on the highway to get to the dealership. I caught enough of a glance to notice they were all Toyotas without seeing it well enough to look over each car in search of a magnetic gray Corolla S. I’ll never know for certain whether my car rode past me last night or not, but I got a call first thing this morning informing me that my car was on the lot and I needed to schedule a time to pick it up. The salesman suggested after I got off work. Right, I’ve been waiting a month for this thing, I’m not waiting til after work. I asked him what time it would be ready and I’d plan my lunch around. So at 1 o’clock, I arrived to the dealer to pick up my new car, 2 hours (!!!!) later, it’s mine.

I’m not complaining too much about the MUCH needed rain, but it would have been nice if the first feature I could have tested was the moonroof, NOT the windshield wipers. Oh well.

2 Responses to “M-M-M-M-My Corolla”

  1. Actually, I looked at the Prius (despite not being particularly thrilled by it’s body style). But the base model Prius starts at about $3k more than what I paid for my fully-loaded Corolla. Not to mention the fact that according to the dealer, had I ordered a Prius on the day I ordered my Corolla, I’d have been looking at a delivery date of potentially March 09!!

    Another thing I’m figuring is that by the time I’m ready to get rid of my Corolla, there will most likely be a fully electric car on the market with the power to be a primary vehicle (and if not then the market will have settled around whatever technology ends up winning out; fuel cell maybe?). That way when I’m ready to buy an alternative energy powered vehicle, I can feel a little more assured that it’s not going to be completely obsolete in a week.

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

Green Tip Tuesday

August 26, 2008

Filed under Green, Splashes

Reuse waste water.

No, I’m not suggesting you dip into the toilet, but alot of relatively clean water goes right down the drain. Use a bowl to capture the water you use to rinse vegetables or the water that runs as you adjust the temperature for your shower. I’m sure you can think of other examples of “clean” water that is just wasted. Use that water to water your garden or houseplants. Also, move the bucket outside on rainy days to store up for when the weather is dryer, just remember to cover your bucket after the storm so it doesn’t become a breeding ground for mosquitoes.

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

It’s Biden

August 23, 2008

Filed under Politics, Splashes

Not much to say at this point. Biden wouldn’t have been my choice, but I’m ok with him. I got nervous when the media was briefly hinting at Rep. Chet Edwards (D -TX) earlier yesterday. If that had been Obama’s choice, I’d have had to give serious consideration to writing in a vote for someone else entirely.

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

Tribal Marriage Equality

August 22, 2008

Filed under Gay Rights

Another government inside US borders has extended marriage equality to it’s people, but it’s not a state. The Coquille Indian Tribe has adopted a new tribal law recognizing same-sex marriages among it’s tribe members. The marriages of course won’t be recognized by the US federal government and most likely not by the state of Oregon (though that remains to be seen). Still, this isn’t anything more than a positive development.

While the Colquille are the first Native American tribe to legalize same-sex marriage in the modern sense of the word, marriages between members of the same-sex were fairly common among nearly all Native American tribes prior to the arrival of westerners. Western explorers documented meeting “Two-Spirits” in their early explorations. Two-Spirits in Native American culture were men or women considered to possess both male and female spirits within their body (regardless of their anatomical gender). What interesting, from a westerner’s perspective, is that these Two-Spirits were not only accepted and welcomed into Native American society, but they were often honored and celebrated, taking on mystical professions such as medicine men. More relevantly to modern gays and lesbians, the spouses of Two-Spirits were often of the same anatomical gender. Two-Spirits started to lose their status when Western anti-gay bigotry began to influence the Native Americans, and eventually became virtually unheard of. It will be interesting to see if the growing acceptance of gays and lesbians in Western culture might bring back the cultural significance of the Two-Spirit in Native American culture.

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

Fiscal Conservative

August 21, 2008

Filed under Politics, Splashes

I couldn’t not post this.

Fiscal Conservative

(via Coyote Chronicles)

One Response to “Fiscal Conservative”

  1. The surpluses during the Clinton administration had three causes, none of which were “bill Clinton” —

    1. The stock market bubble (capital gain tax revenues exploded).
    2. Peace dividend (collapse of USSR, reduction of Navy, etc.).
    3. Most important: GRIDLOCK (i.e., Republican Congress).

    A McCain presidency is unthinkable, but not for this reason. An Obama presidency is unthinkable, for precisely this reason.

    (As you can imagine, I tend to cry myself to sleep these days.)

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

Phelps Fashion

August 19, 2008

Filed under Humor, Splashes

Tell me I’m not the only one who, at first glance at this photo, thought, “Why is Michael Phelps wearing a halter top?”

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

Green Tip Tuesday

August 19, 2008

Filed under Green, Splashes

Know the contents of your fridge.

Unless you live in an igloo, the temperature of your fridge is much cooler than the temperature of your home. Knowing what is inside reduces the amount of time you stand there with the door open letting all the cold air out and the warm air in, as you peruse your supply. If you think the waste of an open refrigerator is negligible, try keeping it closed more often and you might see a savings of $30-$60 a year in electricity usage! Here’s a tip to help you out. Keep a list of your fridge’s contents on the door, and cross off items after you remove them. That way you can peruse your food without opening the door (opening the door only once you know exactly what you’re after), and you’ll have a ready made grocery list (just purchase the crossed out items!).

Have Your Say

* required

Note: This post is over a year and a half old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.