- About
- Blogroll
- Recent Comments
- Archives
- July 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (8)
- May 2009 (10)
- April 2009 (11)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (4)
- January 2009 (16)
- December 2008 (17)
- November 2008 (23)
- October 2008 (17)
- September 2008 (30)
- August 2008 (19)
- July 2008 (17)
- June 2008 (26)
- May 2008 (19)
- April 2008 (13)
- March 2008 (16)
- February 2008 (19)
- January 2008 (25)
- December 2007 (11)
- November 2007 (18)
- October 2007 (16)
- September 2007 (21)
- August 2007 (29)
- July 2007 (23)
- Topics
You just haven’t been “perfected” yet.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200710100008?f=h_top
Dolphin, while I agree with you on the asininity of the statement, consider the source. (I mean, if it’s from the blog I think it’s from.) If the ability to reason logically was a scissors, and the ability to recognize the difference between insult and argument was a sandwich, that guy would still die of starvation stuck inside a paper bag, you know? And while there are those in positions of power in the Republican Party who share the second fault, they mostly don’t share the first: given their premises, their conclusions are logical. And Coulter to them is a useful distractor, nothing more. She may parrot the talking points they hand her, but they don’t trust her to make policy.
No, I’m not ashamed, dolphin; and it’s a little difficult to believe you’re wringing your hands over the potential of the GOP falling apart.
nm, that’s a difficult metaphor to follow, but I get your gist. And you obviously don’t read much of Coulter if you think she “parrot[s] the talking points” of “those in positions of power in the Republican Party.”