I put this little video together of the agility obstacles Zeke and I have been working on. I think he’s doing fantastic for only a month or so of training on them. And we’re both having a great time with it.
The American Family Association is calling for the impeachment of federal judge Vaughn Walker, after he found California’s anti-gay marriage amendment, Prop 8, to be unconstitutional. Their reason is because Judge Walker is gay and therefore should have recused himself from the case. We’ll leave alone the foolish notion that gay judges shouldn’t be allowed to hear cases involving any sort of gay rights issues ever (other than to note that the AFA has also implied that being gay should automatically disqualify someone from being a judge in the first place), for much the same reason that we would ignore the suggestion that no black judge should ever hear a case that in anyway involved civil rights.
The more interesting aspect is that, in their (unsuccessful) rush to discredit the results of the hearing, they are contradicting everything they’ve said up until the case was decided. The point of view they have held up to this point is that gay marriage isn’t about gay people at all, but about protecting straight marriages. After all, (they say) they don’t “hate” gay people, they just don’t want to see straight marriage fail (which would magically happen if gay marriage were legal of course). But if the case is NOT about gay rights, then where is their opposition to a gay judge coming from? If what’s at stake is straight marriage, shouldn’t it be straight married judges who they demand recusal from? In fact, Judge Walker isn’t married yet they demand his recusal on the basis of his orientation alone, so doesn’t it follow that by their own logic, not only should it be straight married judges, but indeed straight judges in general. Accepting the (false) premises that judges should never hear cases that may one day affect their lives, and that gay marriage cases are all about protecting straight marriage; I’m having trouble figuring out how the AFA thinks anybody except a gay judge could hear this particular case.